In addition, Paxton examines such important topics as images of fascism and what we might call ""the future of fascism"" (in a quick aside on a current controversy, Paxton notes that Islamic fundamentalism is not fascist). This is a study of both the intellectual origins of fascism and how it played out in the streets of Berlin, Rome, Paris and other locales. This study has several virtues (and few defects): the writing is free of some of the theoretical jargon that threatens our understanding of a defining political movement of the 20th century. Rather than begin with a definition of fascism, Paxton prefers to give concrete examples of it in action in various countries, from Italy and Germany to France, Holland and Eastern Europe in particular, he examines its ""mobilizing passions,"" such as a sense of overwhelming crisis and dread of a native group's decline. Paxton writes in his introduction that fascism was ""the most self-consciously visual of all political forms,"" yet many of those indelible images (Mussolini haranguing a crowd from a balcony the perfect choreography of totalitarianism in Leni Riefenstahl's Triumph of the Will) can ""induce facile errors"" about the omnipotent leader or the supposed unanimity of the crowd. Paxton, the author of seminal works on Vichy France, now sums up a lifelong reflection on fascism's myriad forms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |